The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the results which investigate about people’s endeavors to consume coffee and tea in 5 given Australian cites (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart) in last 4 weeks.
On an overall, it is conspicuous that the proportion of people going to a café for coffee or tea almost larger than 2 remained habits in 5 cites. However, the opposite data is seen in Australian citizens who bought fresh coffee.
To commence with, in terms of habit of going to a café for coffee or tea, about 63,5% of consumers in both Melbourne and Hobart were considered as the largest data compared to 3 remained cities; while in Adelaide, the figure was under a half of total consumers (roughly 49%). People buying instant coffee in last 4 weeks accounted for about 54% of consumers in Hobart, which was seen as the largest proportion of the habit. In Adelaide, Melbourne and Sydney, the figures of consumers who shared the same routine in Adelaide, Melbourne and Sydney were about 50, 47,5 and 45,5 per cent respectively.
Approximately 43.5% of people in Sydney and Melbourne showed interest in buying fresh coffee; while the data in Brisbane was the lowest of mentioned habit, which nearly reached to 35% of consumers.
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 81
- In many countries people like to eat a wide range of food that cannot be grown in their local place Therefore much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages 84
- Nowadays people have little awareness of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9806763285 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70483087473 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8802034863 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.285714286 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18171264678 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932242777944 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525929587115 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12255569026 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349271095892 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.