The maps show the changes of a small theater in 2010 and 2012.
The diagrams illustrate a number of changes that were made to a small theater from 2010 to 2012.
It is noticeable that four main modifications were made to the theater. These involved the relocation of a media room, storage and ticket office, and the building of some restaurants.
Looking at the maps in more detail, we can see that in 2010, there was a media room behind the stage but in 2012 it was moved to the northwest corner of the theater to make way for a hall. Also, in 2012, showers were also constructed next to the new media and the storage was relocated to the northeast corner.
The two pictures also show that in 2010, there was a café on the right side of the main entrance. However, this was no longer present in 2012 and instead, the ticket office was moved here. Finally, the admin office was moved to the top right corner and a new restaurant area was constructed to replace the old ticket office in 2012.
- The diagram below shows the process of making carbonated drinks Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 67
- the importance of friendship 33
- Question 4 Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Question 4 Some people 89
- The diagram shows how the horse evolved through time with particular emphasis on its foot structure 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48538011696 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39091906261 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538011695906 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2335727028 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.875 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264954668017 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118127998105 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121575437997 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179369800705 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137602121607 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.