The graph below shows US consumers' average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.
The line chart gives information about the average money US consumers expending on mobile phone and landline phone services from 2001 to 2010.
As can be seen from the graph, while the expenditures on cell phone services increased over the period shown, the opposite was true for the other.
In 2001, the yearly spending on residential phone services was almost $700, which was considerably higher than the annual expenditures on mobile ones, at a mere $200. Over the next 5 years, the amount of money spent on cell phones rose gradually to the same amount of money on landline phone services, at roughly $500 in 2006.
From 2006 onwards, the US annual expenditures on mobile phone services surpassed that on residential phone services and mobile became the more common mean of communication. To be specific, yearly spending on cell phone services increased to more than $700 in the last year, while the amount of money spent on landline phone ones decreased to about $400 at the end of the period.
- The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- Essay 5 Some people say that schools should concentrate on teaching students academic subjects that will be used for their future careers Other people say that subjects such as music and sports are also necessary Discuss both views and give your own opini 95
- The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed line phones from 1994 to 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand s population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 20
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84705882353 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59773657135 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 19.5419776095 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 137.333333333 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409656789908 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226304324341 0.103423049105 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841668375765 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272200487562 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626802531777 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84705882353 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59773657135 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 19.5419776095 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 137.333333333 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409656789908 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226304324341 0.103423049105 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841668375765 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272200487562 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626802531777 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.