The maps show the outskirts of the town of Fosbury in 1980 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps show the outskirts of the town of Fosbury in 1980 and 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps depict changes undergone by the outskirts of Fosbury between 1980 and 2015.

A first glance at maps reveal that the area changed tremendously in terms of road layout, residential, recreational, commercial and industrial facilities.

Looking at the details, the 35-year period witnessed an addition of a roundabout in the center of the town, necessitating the demolition of the store of grocery and the apartment building. Goods provision was expanded with a supermarket meeting clients' need for parking space replacing the grocer's store where the one-model house blocks initially had been. By 2015, the former park was resituated opposite the road and decreased in area in order to make space for the flatten houses to be rebuilt in bigger sizes.

With regard to sporting facilities, the removal of two tennis yards and the diversification in the types of sports can be played through the establishment of a sports center were registered. It resembles the commercial one with a parking lot on the side. Moving on to the industrialization in the areal abandoned fields, they were utilized to erect a storing complex.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-12 vuhungbo 73 view
2023-03-11 hyst12 11 view
2022-11-22 Cowy 11 view
2022-11-22 Cowy 56 view
2022-08-16 jaspreet singh11 73 view
Essays by user LEQUANGTHANG :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ased in area in order to make space for the flatten houses to be rebuilt in bigger sizes. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22950819672 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06194324436 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8769586457 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.625 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105308047397 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486585850319 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756111782227 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840084516649 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938274267048 0.0819641961636 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.