The maps show the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now.
The modernization process of a village called Pebbleton is depicted in the two given diagrams after a period of 20 year.
It is of note that there have been some newly constructed buildings in this town today compared to the last 20 years. Noticeably, some facilities have been transformed to be used for another purposes.
As can be clearly seen, the number of houses along the north coast increases by two buildings, to the left of which is a novel community center. Furthermore, a brand-new tennis court was facilited on the left side of the Lighthouse lane, leading to the residence. Last but not least, a footbridge was set up to accommodate travelling from the dwelling to a school on the opposite verge of the river.
Besides, some old buildings was changed to adapt the neighbourhood’s needs. Having located next the residence, an old fort was turned into a children’s playground. Likewise, opposite to the playing field, the apartment block was formerly used as a film studio.
- Attendance at cultural events in Great Britain 96
- The chart below gives information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the com 78
- The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature Write a 150 word description of this diagram for a university lecturer
- Water shortages are causing serious problems all over the world What do you think are the main causes of this situation 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, likewise, so, well, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95808383234 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00065132112 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658682634731 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3308456326 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0803917664721 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331929552707 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777056074709 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704781732193 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103660501659 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.