Moving forward half a decade, the proportions of people who descriced the hotel’s
The pie charts compare the satisfaction levels of guests visiting the Parkway hotel in relation to its customer service in 2005 and 2010.
Overall, customer satisfaction increased considerably over the period given. While most guests rated this hotel’s guest service as satisfactory or poor in the first year, a clear majority of customers described it as good or excellent in the second.
With respect to the first year, the hotel’s visitors who considered its guest service to be acceptable accounted for 45%, which was the largest of all. While 36% of cases in total gave negative feedback, including poor (21%) and very poor (15%), only 19% responded positively, with the percentages for “good” and “excellent” ratings being 14% and 5% respectively.
Moving forward half a decade, the proportions of people who descriced the hotel’s customer service as excellent or good grew significantly to 28% and 39% respectively, taking top positions. By contrast, only 16% of customers rated the service as poor (12%) or very poor (4%). Similarly, the number of the “satisfactory” ratings shrunk dramatically, from 45 to 17%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-19 | hungnguyen123 | 78 | view |
- The table illustrates how many travelers visited six World Heritage sites in Australia every 2 years from 1996 to 2000
- As a result many believe camera surveillance is inadvisable and privacy is one of the most important rights which must be respected in this civilised world 78
- I disagree with this viewpoint and believe that the imposition of taxes on imported food is of paramount importance to the agricultural sector of a country 84
- The use of surveillance cameras to deter criminals is becoming increasingly prevalent in many large cities all over the world 78
- The three pie charts compare the percentage of people who learnt English in three different ways in three nations in 2010 and 2015
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, similarly, while, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36312849162 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1757700536 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620111731844 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2961395547 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170576905525 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752996579959 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139379323367 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994166522075 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995956781149 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.