Some people think that building new rail tracks for speedy trains between cities are essential, even if it takes a huge amount of money. On the other hand, some reject this idea saying we should work on improving the system. I think this is an issue of rather complexity and this requires in depth discussion.
The believers point towards the dated infrastructure of the railways and the other forms of commuters. Given the nature of complex modern life, crowded cities with their ever rushing population, the citizens demand for an extreme makeover -- speedy vehicles. In other words, they desire to move forward with advancement and time, which according to them is only possible by embracing modernization. And then, more often than not, drastic changes require plenty of money, which the supporters validate by counting the possible blessings. They have an excellent example -- China's superfast train. When this country launched a high-tech train, their economy jumped as the business became faster and smoother. In other words, the argument is justified by the modern world's dreamers who want to thrive under any circumstances. And for them, slow and backdated transports are absolute hinders which demand to be eliminated.
On the contrary, the opponents indicate the cost effectiveness of the transformation, while addressing the adequately functioning but time-consuming vehicles. In other words, while embracing the need of updating the system, these people want to be more pragmatic and desire to go with the investment in the existing structure, according to them that re-funding is the key to an already functioning system. Possibly, it would not be the most cutting-edge system, nonetheless, meeting modern world's expectations just might prove to be enough. In the case of Mongolia's recent changes, instead of investment to build a new airport they renovated the old one. And it turned out to be a wise decision for them. It appears that creating something from scratch, might be an extravagant idea, particularly then when we can not estimate or calculate the outcome.
The sum up, meeting the new world's demands is crucial, as our very way of life depends on it. However, I think we can incorporate new innovation and technological advancement into our existing system by finding it more aggressively. Therefore, the plan of a new track with a cost of fortune seems futile.
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 73
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gument is justified by the modern worlds dreamers who want to thrive under any ci...
^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...it. However, I think we can incorporate new innovation and technological advancement into our ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, therefore, while, i think, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 5.60731707317 535% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 965.302439024 209% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 385.0 196.424390244 196% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22857142857 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 3.73543355544 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91543873185 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 106.607317073 214% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592207792208 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 283.868780488 217% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5937495415 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.65 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221638157619 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591284963395 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530426471822 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132780692987 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556625764207 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 40.7170731707 258% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.