percentage of British people giving money to
charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The given graph illustrates the proportion of British people who donate money to charity of different age groups. The graph represents data from the years 1990 and 2010.
It is clear that there is a reduction in the percentage of younger adults who donated to charities between the given two years. In contrast, more donations are observed from elders in 2010 as compared to 1990. The highest contribution can be seen from the age-group of 36-50 , where almost 43% of them donated money for good causes in 1990. However, this number dropped to about 35% in the year 2010. The lowest contribution came from the age-group of 18-25 with 16% in 1990 which shrunk down to only about 6% in 2010.
It is also worth noting that, although the contribution declined across the two years for the age group of upto 50 , there is a slight rise visible for the age group of 50 to 65+. While the highest contribution in 1990 was from the age group of 36-50 , the age group of 51-65 contributed the most in the year 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-21 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Bao Chau Phan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | oanhlilies | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | preetsidhu29500@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | cinderel | view |
- percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 78
- Some students tend to travel after finishing school and spend time working somewhere instead of going to the university directly What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples f 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... can be seen from the age-group of 36-50 , where almost 43% of them donated money ...
^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e two years for the age group of upto 50 , there is a slight rise visible for the ...
^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... in 1990 was from the age group of 36-50 , the age group of 51-65 contributed the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58563535912 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43352063569 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552486187845 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3396158735 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2222222222 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356530993788 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151584621632 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482795686852 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26127659367 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576112280257 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.