The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.

Essay topics:

The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.

The table gives information about the proportion of participation in five different sports of schoolboys in two age groups in the UK in 2010.

Overall, it can be seen that the percentage of 6-to-11-year-old boys taking part in playing sports was higher than that of the older group, with the exception of swimming. Also, football was the most popular sports in both age groups.

In 2010, the percentage of participation in football in boys between 6 and 11 was higher than the 12-to-16-year-old group, which accounted for 87% and 78% respectively. Likewise, basketball was more preferred by the younger group than the older one. The involvement of male students who belonged to the 6-to-11-year-old group was 35%, whereas the figure for the older group was 25%. 45% of younger schoolboys joined in playing cricket, in comparison with only 34% of those aged 12 to 16.

In the same year, 6-to-11-year-old male youngsters were slightly more interested in rugby than the older students. The figures were 23% and 21% respectively, a difference of only 2%. However, two age groups shared the same level of interest in swimming, at just 19%, which was the lowest figure in all data surveyed.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-06 trunghn1 56 view
2019-10-15 nhaothuy 61 view
2019-10-15 nhaothuy 73 view
2019-08-16 Marita 61 view
2019-08-16 Marita 56 view
Essays by user lemanh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...as higher than that of the older group, with the exception of swimming. Also, football was the most p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0404040404 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12356486789 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9399512723 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308704903576 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127398542249 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118212593287 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227166024229 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134290925347 0.0819641961636 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.