Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today mobile phones and computers are becoming indispensable to many people. While I agree that the application of high – tech devices in communication is beneficial in some ways, I believe that people’s ability to interact directly with one another seems to be degraded.
On the one hand, mobile phones and computers benefit communication to some extent. Firstly, using these devices could be much of convenience. The emergence of phones and the internet allows people to easily make a call to someone who lives far away while the time budget is not enough for them to pay a visit. This may be helpful in maintaining strong relationships with relatives or foreign friends. Secondly, a great deal of time and money could be saved by utilizing phones and computers. For instance, due to the availability of the internet and the technology of video conferencing, many business meetings and could be held without the presence of participants in the actual holding places. Consequently, the travelling time to those places and the amount money that could have been used for hosting attendants are certainly spared.
On the other hand, there are some reasons why the increasing use of mobile phones and computers discourages real interaction. One reason is that many individuals are spending so much time using those technologically leading – edge gadgets that they rarely communicate with others, and from time to time, they may forget how to contact to people in the real world. Furthermore, there are many articles on the internet and dialogues in games containing words that are inappropriate for real-life interaction. If silver surfers and gamers interact with those contents too often via mobile phones and computers, their verbal communication skills will deteriorate quickly.
In conclusion, it is true that mobile phones and computers have revolutionized the way people interact, but a downfall of communication is being experienced due to the overuse of these devices.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29337539432 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03258450479 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558359621451 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0102503499 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185905604509 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068698887632 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491670296552 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129360427713 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241230461976 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.