Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that people are losing the ability to communicate face to face and mobile phones and computers must take a large share of the blame for this. I completely agree with this idea.
There are some reasons why computers have to take responsibility for the decline of people’s communication skills. Firstly, although people can easily make new friends via the Internet, they do not really know about the virtual ones. This will let people be under illusions about their acquaintances in the virtual world. Secondly, there are many criminals using false identities to find out information about us. This could not happen with face to face communication. For example, a pedophile may pretend to be a teenager to arrange a meeting with a vulnerable young person via a social network page.
Apart from the practical disadvantages of computers expressed above, I believe that using mobile phones also reduces our skills in terms of personal communication. The first reason is that, because of extreme focusing on cell phones or computers, people no longer want to spend time with their true friends and their families. For example, mealtimes when all the family used to get together are becoming a thing of the past. The youngsters are often to be found having a snack in their rooms while texting or chatting online. In addition, by using cell phones for a long time, people can lose their confidence when they have to talk in front of crowds. My close friend, for instance, is so addicted to chatting and playing games on her smart phone that she becomes shy and afraid of doing presentations in lessons.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the usage of mobile phones and computers can negatively affect the communication skills of people.
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010. 78
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, may, really, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96610169492 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75068401824 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5034220661 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255110461966 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825268504901 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773636000311 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167757764424 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078789627345 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.