the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of reason’s less productively of agricultural lands in four different groups, and the table shows affected of it on three regions of the world during 1990s.
In general, the most important causes related to over-grazing by 35 percent that in Europe affected more than other regions of 7.7 percent during 1990s.
As can be seen, there are three main causes that agricultural lands become less productive such as over-grazing, deforestation, and over-cultivation ordered by 35,30, and 28 percent and another group exist too which was no longer significant. The Europe affected more than others in the mentioned causes. Deforestation has 9.8 percent amount of 23 percent and remined related to over-cultivation and over-grazing by 7.7 and 5.5 percent. After Europe, the Oceania located at second place by totally 13 percent that over-grazing affected on it of 11.3 percent and finally the North America by 5 percent located at third place that over-cultivation in this region has most affected on agricultural during 1990s.
Totally, during 1990s Europe affected more than other regions by 23 percent.
- The working week should be shorter and workers should have longer weekend Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable be shared freely Discuss both these views and give yo 67
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- the graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predications for 2030 and 2040
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...ted of it on three regions of the world during 1990s. In general, the most important causes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
... more than other regions of 7.7 percent during 1990s. As can be seen, there are three main...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 696, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...egion has most affected on agricultural during 1990s. Totally, during 1990s Europe affected...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...on agricultural during 1990s. Totally, during 1990s Europe affected more than other regions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, third, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37222222222 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14789269116 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9762786028 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.142857143 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240863118327 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136597957316 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139103981577 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201162846044 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146926353337 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.