The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children’s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The pie charts illustrate the details of revenue sources and the expenditure of a children's charity center in the USA over a year. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, it is clear that the most significant amount received from food donations, and the least source of money was an investment and government grants. Whereas, the program service represents the major expense of the charity center in the USA in 2016.
To begin with, the income from the donated food was 86.6%, and the community contributions account for 10.4%. Similarly, another source of money for the charity center was program revenue which comprises 2.2% of the total money. When government grants and investment income shows only 0.2% while other income was 0.4% in 2016.
Regarding the expense, the overwhelming majority of money sent from the charity center was for program services which consist of 95.86% of the total money received. Compared to fundraising 2.6%, the management and general expenditure was low which is a mere 1.6% over the given year in the USA charity center.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as an investment and government grants. Whereas, the program service represents the maj...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while, as for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14367816092 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62177961807 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545977011494 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9958289274 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151824735796 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678815677954 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555221411464 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110128712845 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041537672673 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as an investment and government grants. Whereas, the program service represents the maj...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while, as for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14367816092 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62177961807 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545977011494 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9958289274 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151824735796 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678815677954 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555221411464 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110128712845 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041537672673 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.