The pie chart shows different types of transport crossing the bridge in the UK in 1965, 1985 and 2005
The pie charts illustrate four kinds of transport crossing the bridge in the UK in three years, namely 1965, 1985 and 2005.
In general, there was a noticeable increase in the percentages of private cars and recreational vehicles which crossed the bridge, while a constant trend can be seen if we look at the figures for public transport, lorries, and other commercial vehicles. It is also clear that the figure for private cars crossing the bridge was higher than for any other type of transport over the period shown.
At the beginning of the period, 47% of vehicles crossing this bridge were private cars, compared to only 29% of public transport. Over the following 20 years, the proportion of private cars which crossed the bridge rose slightly, before climbing to a peak of 74% in 2005. In contrast, public transport followed the opposite trend to that of private cars, with figures decreasing to 5% in 2005.
In 1965, the percentage of larries and other commercial vehicles crossing the bridge stood at 20%, while the figure for recreational vehicles was lower, at 4%. After 20 years, the proportion of larries and other commercial vehicles increased to 26% but decreased to 12% in 2005. Furthermore, The UK saw the percentage of recreational vehicles rise significantly, to 9%
- The development of science and technology benefit our life However scientists cannot find effective solutions to the problems they created To what degree do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- In modern age some people believe that it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 73
- The pie chart shows different types of transport crossing the bridge in the UK in 1965 1985 and 2005 67
- The maps below show how a college looks at present and what it will look like after a proposed development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99069767442 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76161591185 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497674418605 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4207096291 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286868860738 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138416576195 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135510216973 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225772887227 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165972045955 0.0819641961636 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.