Some people think the increasing use of technology in the workplace is good for young people's prospects of gaining jobs and harder for old people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that the increasing presence of technology in companies and factories is beneficial for young people's prospects of gaining employments and more difficult for old people. While there might be some supporting arguments, I still disagree with this view due to more convincing reasons.
On the one hand, this opinion seems reasonable simply because old people tend to be disadvantaged in this field compared to young people. To illustrate, Most universities provide their students with opportunities to learn technological skills, such as keyboarding, and coding. As a result, it could be difficult for them to complete the jobs of the young generation in the modern workplace which depends on technology.
In spite of the arguments above, I highly go against this view for the following reasons. Firstly, many companies more and more help the old generation to have better access to technologies. Taking those companies as an example, they often provide computer courses for old people. Thus, These employees who take part in programs could be faced with less technological problems in the modern workplace. Another reason is that the elderly might bring many values to their companies. For instance, senior employees who have experience and management skills, as well as business relationships, are difficult to obtain at the young age. Consequently, some of them are still able to complete with young workers.
In conclusion, I recognize possible arguments to accept the discussed view, there are more convincing reasons to believe this idea is unreasonable
- Many educators believe that international exchange trips are beneficial for students Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Today fewer elderly people live with their children than in the past Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that money is better to spend on human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Some people say that people should have a different amount of holidays according to their jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 51
- The charts below show qualification of graduates working in one advertising company in the year 1990 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...values to their companies. For instance, senior employees who have experience and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3967611336 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99374029358 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574898785425 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6139332043 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.538461538 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246606958781 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807437923962 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103067242496 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155078086828 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122871982326 0.056905535591 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.