The pie chart shows the distribution of different religions in Vietnam in the year 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart compare the percentage of allocation religions of Viet Nam in 2009.
It is clear that none of religions people was the most common choice in 2009. The Buddhist had the highest people in Viet Nam
In 2009, none of religions people was 81,9% while religions people were 18,2%. In the religions. The none of religions more people than religions people nearly 4 times.
In the religions, The Buddhist was the highest religions and there was 7,9% while Cao Dai was the lowest and had 0,9%. In addition, the Roman Catholic was second religion in Viet Nam and had 6,6% people. Two religions had more 1% was Hoa Hao and the Other religions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | KhangVTran | 56 | view |
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Numbers of Vietnamese immigrating to the US from 1980 to 2017Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 22
- The chart shows the numbers of tourists to Phu Quoc in the years from 2012 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart shows the export value of Viet Nam fruits in the year 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie chart shows the distribution of different religions in Vietnam in the year 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2009, none of religions people was 81,9% while religions people were 18,2%. In th...
^^
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the highest religions and there was 7,9% while Cao Dai was the lowest and had 0,9...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 541.0 965.302439024 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 115.0 196.424390244 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70434782609 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.27472217062 3.73543355544 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3546438852 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 56.0 106.607317073 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486956521739 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 152.1 283.868780488 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2529068457 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.625 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.375 22.9334400587 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114621075344 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065294410217 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522793049358 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965338159626 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543972881132 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.53 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 16.0 40.7170731707 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.