Essay topics:
The chart shows the export value of Viet Nam fruits in the year 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates Viet Nam’s fruits to export and export value of each fruits in 2013.
Overall, there was fourteen fruits was selected to export. Dragon fruit is the most choice to export.
The Dragon fruit is the highest value export and had 454 millions USD while Citrus fruits is the lowest value export and had 0,8 millions. The second value export is Coconuts and products. It was 165 millions USD.
There was twelve fruits which had value export less 50 millions USD. Value export of Lychee had 45 millions USD and it was the third of fruits to export.
Votes
This essay topic by users
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
2020-01-23 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
2020-01-23 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
2020-01-23 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
2020-01-21 | Pham Mai Nguyet | 56 | view |
Essay Categories
Essays by user KhangVTran
:
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The pie chart shows the distribution of different religions in Vietnam in the year 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Numbers of Vietnamese immigrating to the US from 1980 to 2017Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 22
- The chart shows the export value of Viet Nam fruits in the year 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart shows the numbers of tourists to Phu Quoc in the years from 2012 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'valued'.
Suggestion: valued
...SD. There was twelve fruits which had value export less 50 millions USD. Value expo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 33.7804878049 24% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 478.0 965.302439024 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 100.0 196.424390244 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.16227766017 3.73543355544 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10817456583 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 48.0 106.607317073 45% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 126.9 283.868780488 45% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4168744798 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 59.75 112.824112599 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.5 22.9334400587 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25094228827 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140701018378 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08198935125 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199174146834 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691664435353 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 13.2329268293 55% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.68 61.2550243902 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.44 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 14.0 40.7170731707 34% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.