The graphs, including pie charts and table give data about the total cost and the origin of fish coming to the US between 1988 and 2000.
It can be clearly seen from the table that the value of fish increased gradually from 1988 to 2000. Also, there are many changes in percentage of the sources of fish coming to the US through out the years.
First, looking at the table, we can see that 2000 was the only year that the total value of fish surpassed 10 billions of dollars. In addition, the number soared slowly from 6.57 billions of dollars in 1988 to 10.72 billions of dollars in 2000.
In the pie charts below, the sources of fish, consisting of China, Canada and others showed different trends. For example, in 1988, Canada was the main origin of fish imported to the US with 60%. In the next years, the quantity dropped significantly to just 28% in 2000 and also ranked the lowest number in 3 areas. The contrary trend happened in China. Staying at the lowest point in 1988 with 15%, the proportion then climbed quickly to reach 30% in 2000. The final trend was fluctuation, appeared in other areas, with the number rose sharply then fell marginally between 1988 and 2000.
In conclusion, we can see that despite the changing in the proportion of the sources of fish coming to USA through out the years from 1988 to 2000, the total cost still kept growing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...of the sources of fish coming to the US through out the years. First, looking at the tab...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '10 billion'.
Suggestion: 10 billion
... that the total value of fish surpassed 10 billions of dollars. In addition, the number soared...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '57 billion'.
Suggestion: 57 billion
...dition, the number soared slowly from 6.57 billions of dollars in 1988 to 10.72 billions of do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '72 billion'.
Suggestion: 72 billion
... 6.57 billions of dollars in 1988 to 10.72 billions of dollars in 2000. In the pie charts b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 108, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...on of the sources of fish coming to USA through out the years from 1988 to 2000, the total ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, still, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57085020243 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22403223796 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493927125506 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7040602304 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0833333333 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437636069397 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150377634124 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128601728057 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259461760474 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140842169168 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.