There are many famous examples of a noble and talented leader in the world. In addition, we can see many models of leader around us. It can be your monitor, your boss, etc. Therefore, it is easy to see that both trends of a naturally-born leader or a learned leader still exist nowadays.
People who were born to become a leader are the kind of people we need, however these people are hard to find. In wartime, Napoleon was a good example. With his nature talent of leader, he guided France to become the strongest nation in military, with many victories and the territory was expanded. When we live in peace, Putin and Merkel are very famous. With their unique styles of leadership, they have brought prosperity and a rich life to their citizens. We all know that those skills came to them when they were still very young, even they didn't need to experience skills through classes or books. It is just like they were born to become a leader in the future. In the classroom, teachers also want to choose the smartest and the most energetic person to become a monitor.
However, some people didn't have a nature gift when they were young, but they had a desire to become a leader later. Therefore they need to learn skills. It isn't hard if they really want to achieve it. To become a leader, we need to be more sociable, talk more, learn soft skills and listen to the partners. Also, your achievements need to be abundant and beautiful. Nothing is impossible, it is just how much effort you put on your dream of becoming a leader.
Leader is the most important person in his/her area. Therefore, when you are a leader, you have to face problems more than anybody else. Being a naturally good leader is fantastic, however, people respect leaders who earn the role through a hard process. Because if you have a dream of that high role and successfully achieve it, you deserve to receive applause from everyone.
- Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 56
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 47
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 61
- Some people argue that the fittest and strongest individuals and teams can achieve the greatest success in sports But other people think the success is much related to the mental attitude Discuss both views and give your opinion 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...n they were still very young, even they didnt need to experience skills through class...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...come a monitor. However, some people didnt have a nature gift when they were young...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... had a desire to become a leader later. Therefore they need to learn skills. It isnt hard...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...Therefore they need to learn skills. It isnt hard if they really want to achieve it....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, still, therefore, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61111111111 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3962786631 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517543859649 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8494784315 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.6818181818 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5454545455 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226465769981 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653156797266 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612859254653 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145555268931 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031173403729 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.0946893788 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.