The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given charts compare Japan and Malaysia in terms of the general domestic expenditures on five major categories in the year 2010.
Overall, it is clear that while Japanese families spent the highest money on other goods and services, housing was the highest sector of expenditure in Malaysia. In addition, both countries spent the least amount of money on the healthcare sector in 2010.
Taking a close look, families in Japan make most of their expenses on goods and services, at 29 percent, compared to 26 percent in Malaysia. Similarly, the percentage of expenditure on transport in Japan was exactly 20 percent, which doubled that in the country of Malaysia, which was only 10 percent. In this year, healthcare made up only 6 percent and 3 percent of the total spending in Japan and Malaysia respectively.
On the contrary, while Japanese households spent only 21 percent of their money on housing, this category made up the largest part in Malaysian household spending, which was 34 percent. In both countries, food came as the second highest spending category, which was 24 percent in Japan and 27 percent in Malaysia.
- Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think is it happening How to solve this issue 78
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Financial education should be a madatory component of the school program To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, similarly, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02659574468 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71221834273 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8045588473 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.125 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148811703989 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811721579548 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537255303712 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112536234273 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063162681999 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.