The pie charts below shows the average household exoenditure in a country in 1950 and 2010.
The two pie charts illustrate the information about the household expenditure on goods and services in 1950 and 2010. As an overview, the highest amount if money spent on housing in 1950 which replaced by food in 2010.
In 2010, the largest proportion of expenditure was on food while in 1950 it was on housing, with food for just 11.2%. However, there was a great difference in housing expenditure between the two years. In 1950, 72.1% of the total household budget went towards compared to only 22% in 2010.
Further, the amount of money splurged on healthcare and transportation showed increased in the 2010 in comparison to 1950. In addition to this, in 1950, the money spent on education noticed as only 6.6% which declined by 0.3% in 2010.
To sum up, it is immediately obvious that there are some quite significant changes between the two years.
- The chart below shows household spending patterns in the two countries between 1980 and 2008. 40
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particulur nation. 90
- The bar chart shows active participation rates in top ten sports in 1998 and 2005 60
- Some people Say that self-employment is better than a job in a company or in a institutions which one is better? 73
- The chart below shows the make and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0. In 2010, the largest proportion of expenditure was on food while in 1950 it...
^^
Line 6, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d as only 6.6% which declined by 0.3% in 2010. To sum up, it is immediately ob...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 725.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93197278912 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70428485096 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578231292517 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 199.8 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 13.6106575888 43.030603864 32% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.625 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257283136423 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115469472771 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918466462132 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145105896417 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980673442847 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.