The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion in clothes and other consumer goods. Do you agree or disagree?
With the development of information technology, many people believe that human beings have the ability to copy one another, which is illustrated in fashion trends and other purchasing goods. Personally, I completely agree with this statement for the following reasons.
In terms of globalization, imitation makes society better day by day. Based on the existence of current items, people create new ones with newer functions and still maintain the basis of those items. For instance, in fashion trends, evening gowns have been improved and developed based on the characteristics of the designers; however, those gowns still have the same basis that helps women look gorgeous when wearing them. Moreover, based on the function of an ordinary watch, Apple create a new one called Apple Watch, which is a smartwatch with more facilities and still contains the abilities as the others. Therefore, copying now is a way for human beings to enhance the world’s development.
In addition, in terms of brands, copying helps the brands to gain profit by providing merchandise having the same functions at a competitive price. Taking the competition between Samsung and other Android smartphones as an example. While Samsung tries to provide customers with the newest technological devices at a high price as proving its high quality, Xiaome launches new smartphones at lower prices but still includes the same basic function as a Samsung smartphone has. Hence, imitation contributes a lot to the sales of many brands.
In conclusion, I fully agree with the statement that the tendency of people to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion and other consumer goods
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-24 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | vedant.vp2010@gmail.com | 11 | view |
- Schools should focus on academic success and passing examinations Skills such as cookery dressmaking and woodworking should not be taught at school as it is better to learn these from family To what extent do you agree with this view 78
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Plan A shows a health centre in 2005 Plan B shows the same place in the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 485, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Apple) must be used with a third-person verb: 'creates'.
Suggestion: creates
...he function of an ordinary watch, Apple create a new one called Apple Watch, which is ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83107173026 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570895522388 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3827491001 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.25 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212548235592 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850581226045 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137644887254 0.0667982634062 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195609035346 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186446043525 0.056905535591 328% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.