The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.
The given map illustrates the current structure for university of sports and the future plan for university’ sports after refurbishment.
In general, it can be seen, the university has now outdoor courts, but after innovation, the proposed structure does not have this facility. However, the cafe and spots shop is added to new structure of university of sports.
To begin with the present hierarchy of university, it can be observed that, the structure consists of two outdoor courts in the east and west sides respectively. While the Gym is located in the north of university. Moreover, the seating is situated in the east of university near pool which its square 25 meters. Finally, the reception is located in front of pool in the south side.
Turning to new structure of university, it can be witnessed that, the leisure pool is added to east of structure which is no this facility in old structure. In addition, in new structure has 3 position for changing room which was one position in the old one (the east side near pool). For people who have like dancing, the new structure has two dance studios which is not exist in the old structure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n the east and west sides respectively. While the Gym is located in the north of univ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rsity. Moreover, the seating is situated in the east of university near pool whic...
^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... is added to east of structure which is no this facility in old structure. In addi...
^^
Line 4, column 370, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ture has two dance studios which is not exist in the old structure.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, moreover, so, while, in addition, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83838383838 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.831924063 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4752026069 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10415321617 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456866703888 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783746077327 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969324583895 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101357193462 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.