The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
The pictures compare how different a park has changed from the opening day to the current day.
Overall, the park has changed dramatically since the beginning by building more utility facilities. Especially, the space is extended with the underground car park, however, the size in surface is unchanged over this period.
It is clear that there are still two entrances, one on Eldon street and the other is located at Arnold avenue. Next to the Eldon street gate used to be a glass house, now it is replaced by a water feature. On the opposite side, the pond was demolished to make way for a children play area with a cafe nearby.
One of the notable changes is a beautiful fountain in the center is now where a rose garden located with four sides are arranged with seats for visitors. The seats used to placed around the park but now they are installed only in the middle. On the left side, a small stage for musicians is upgraded to a huge amphitheatre which can contain a numerous audience and hold in concerts.
- the chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 the table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compaired with 2015 84
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are playedalone.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In some countries, there has been an increase in the number of parents who educate their children themselves at home instead of sending them to school. Do you think the advantage of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people think that we can use as much fresh water as we want Others think that fresh water supply should be controlled strictly by governments as the sources are limited Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- Some people believe tthat it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Other argues that it is better to try and improve such situations. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59340659341 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51679541231 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.4792463716 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102423196566 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442094894788 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508906806963 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719314225656 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541125011701 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.