The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

Essay topics:

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.

The two pictures give information about some changes to the Grande Park which opened in the year 1920.

It is clear that the public park has changed considerably with new facilities. By contrast the entrances on the Arnold Avenue and the Eldon Street remain the same.

In 1920, located in the middle of two entrances, the fountain was in the center of the park, while it has been replaced with a square rose garden with seats surrounding it. Also, the stage for musicians has gone and in its place is an amphitheatre for concerts. The rose garden in the south west corner has been removed, whereas there is no change to the north one.

Besides, where the glasshouse stood there is a water feature. And a café has been built to the right of the north entrance to replace the rose garden. In the north east corner is the children’s play area where used to be pond for water plants. What’s more, now there is another entrance in the underground car park from the east of the park.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-30 yasamin27 78 view
2020-01-14 BIBHU KALITA 73 view
2020-01-09 tbinh 73 view
2020-01-06 Carry_42 73 view
2019-12-31 Manolito 67 view
Essays by user despair :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61797752809 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47030080402 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589887640449 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7099260194 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176972843051 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664724936779 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754957440406 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1201504997 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505734716246 0.0819641961636 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.