The two maps illustrate some changes were made to a park called Grange Park in 1920. After the planned development, the old park was totally renovated.
To begin with, there was a fountain at the center of the park and a stage for musicians at the left side of it when visitors entered from the Eldon Street entrance. Moreover, some seats, rose garden and glasshouse were located beside the that entrance. When entering from the entrance next to the Arnold Avenue, there were seats at the right and pond for water plants at the left. Also, there were rose garden at the both sides of that entrance.
After planned development, the fountain was replaced with a square rose garden which surrounding with seats. At the same time, the rose garden next to the Eldon Street, the stage for musicians and seats next to it were been demolished to make way for amphitheater for concerts. The rose garden at the right side of the entrance beside the Arnold Avenue was been kept. While the another rose garden next to the Arnold Avenue and the pond beside it were been replaced with a café and children’s play area respectively. Lastly, the glasshouse and the seats which almost linked with it were been removed to make place for a water feature and there was an entrance of underground car park next to it.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 67
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admissions to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...den at the both sides of that entrance. After planned development, the fountain ...
^^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
...f the entrance beside the Arnold Avenue was been kept. While the another rose garden nex...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, lastly, moreover, so, while, as to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6652173913 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36555704083 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430434782609 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5091561938 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5454545455 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125637452433 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623411761314 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598910556942 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118541580871 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720560834145 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.