The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The blueprints illustrate the development of a particular movie theatre has altered over three years, from 2010 to 2012.
Overall, the cinema expanded sideways, adding more free spaces for the establishment of more facilities.
The building’s main entrance on the south side and the central section are the two features of the playhouse that remained relatively intact, with unchanged seating quantity in the auditorium. While the stage’s position remained fixed, its dimension was expanded, creating more performance spaces. Moreover, several adjustments were made to the building’s layout such as the relocations and conversions of some original amenities and the construction of three new areas: the hall, the shower, and the restaurant.
The storage on the top left side was moved to the opposite edge, replaced by the media and the showers. A hall was added at the back of the stage, aimed to develop the performers’ preparation zone. In 2010, there was a café right next to the entrance. However, in 2012, this facility was substituted by the ticket office, and the coffee shop was then replaced by a larger restaurant laid in the left rear corner of the theatre. Finally, due to the establishment of the bistro, the administration office was moved to the extended left corner.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-28 taoxanh99 80 view
2024-06-27 taoxanh99 78 view
2024-06-26 Zahid6400 67 view
2024-06-24 nguyendangquang.aspect 78 view
2024-06-24 nguyendangquang.aspect 67 view
Essays by user vtnh.anh :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, moreover, so, then, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24038461538 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96252168993 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629807692308 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7995815881 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0535591882957 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.021431894551 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283569306171 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0331831047149 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262224512749 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.