The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
This table shows information regarding the percentage of students who joined four different categories of high school in the years 2000, 2005 and 2009.
Overall, what stands out from the table is that both of the Voluntary-controlled and Community Schools had the highest percentage of those who attended high schools over this period, however, the Specialist and Grammar schools went to have a similar proportion of student‘ joint in a significant decline.
To begin, the percentage of pupils in Voluntary-controlled schools was the highest among the four types of secondary schools in 2000 (52%), although it fell in a remarkable decrease to reach (20%) by the year of 2009. On the other hand, Community schools had a small proportion of pupils in 2000 (12%) then it went into a dramatically increase by 2009 to hit the highest percent at all (58%).
Significantly, both of the Specialist and Grammar schools had a quite similar percentage of students who prefer them to choose for high school accomplishment, it was minority as it ranged only between (10%) and (24%) over the mentioned period.
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 88
- Some people think that some types of criminals should not go to prison Instead they should do unpaid work in the community To what extent do you agree 73
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 73
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 73
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they are released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What effects will this have on society 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...of pupils in 2000 12% then it went into a dramatically increase by 2009 to hit the highest percent at a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, second, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20408689637 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7335363374 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.4 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 22.9334400587 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339630435593 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173459065515 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629543417827 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179598948151 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821540168317 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.2329268293 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.