The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The average levels of enrolment in education and tertiary school level of mature people from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore are revealed by graphs.
Overall, the average number of years spent at school for adult males were several times more than adult females throughout the entire period. Master qualifications and university qualifications became the highest ones among all qualifications from 2000 to 2010.
In regards to the average number of years had been spent at school for adult males since 2000 to 2004 had shown a slight increase from 8.5 years to 9.5 years but from 2004 to 2010 the number boomed and reached to the peak by almost 12 years. The number of adult females stayed constant by 8 years from 2000 to 2002 then went up gradually from 2002 to 2010 by 8 years to 9 years.
The trend of qualifications was only slightly different. University qualifications and master qualifications went up from 2000 to 2010 from less than a fifth to more than half of all qualification, while, high school qualifications, secondary school qualifications and primary school qualifications were just over four-fifth in 2000 then dipped to just over a third in 2010.
- The graphs below show unemployment rates and average earnings according to level of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighboring town since 1962 78
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 73
- In your opinion should young people choose their profession or should their parents choose for them 80
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 in Singapore are revealed by graphs. Overall, the average number of years spe...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... all qualifications from 2000 to 2010. In regards to the average number of year...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...l qualifications from 2000 to 2010. In regards to the average number of years had been sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om 2002 to 2010 by 8 years to 9 years. The trend of qualifications was only sli...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97448979592 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94985775358 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479591836735 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.0193854064 43.030603864 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.285714286 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281852550571 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146766510287 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138982208308 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214178191951 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150900425702 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.