Road Access To City Hospital
The two maps illustrate changes introduced between 2007 to 2010 to the roads that lead to a city hospital.
In an overview, it is lucid that no changes were made to the area of the city hospital and in the number of roads. The only modifications introduced were new roundabouts, a separate car park space for the public, and a single bus station.
It is shown in 2007 that there were 3 bus stops on either side of the hospital road, which were replaced with one big bus station on the west side of the hospital road in 2010. Also, this bus station was accessible via two roundabouts. One was built at the junction of the ring road and hospital road, and the other one was built at the intersection of city road and hospital road.
In terms of car park facilities, the original car park was meant for public and staff use. However, it was designated to the hospital's workers only in 2010. A separate space for car-parking for the people was constructed on the west side of the ring road.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- You have heard that a developer plans to build a shopping center near your home Write a letter to the council How you heard about the plan Explain how you feel about it Ask for more information about it 82
- You recently completed a course and you borrowed a book from your teacher which you couldn t return in time You would like to return the book now Write a letter to your teacher and say What book was it How helpful was the book Explain why you couldn t ret 79
- Road Access To City Hospital 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: buses; busses
... It is shown in 2007 that there were 3 bus stops on either side of the hospital ro...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50549450549 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52885771884 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0079356083 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1111111111 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369903641971 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138331169308 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118201073592 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201456914744 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143214833886 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.