Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The flowchart depicts the main process of plastic bottles recycling with different sophisticated techniques.
In general, the report registers nine crucial steps to regenerate plastic products from worthless objects to daily things, which meet the demands of human.
To begin with, in the initial stage, having been released by residents into a public bin, plastic waste is then collected by an enormous container, which taking all the garbages to recycling center, where they are cautiously sorted by factory’s employees. In addition, the waste after being classified is now compressed into various rectangular blocks, which are crushed into minimal pieces by special crushing machine, and then washed by chemical liquid.
Futhermore, not only are these pieces washed in a huge cistern, but they are also transformed into numerous pellets by a specialized machine. In the next step, those pellets are heated to form raw materials, which are used to massively produced two main types of goods, namely single-use plastic food storage, including bottles of water, food boxes and other diverse products, comprising of garments, recycling bags and even pencils. After all, when the inhabitants dispose of them, they are ready for the similar circulation.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-27 taoxanh99 78 view
2024-06-26 Zahid6400 67 view
2024-06-24 nguyendangquang.aspect 78 view
2024-06-24 nguyendangquang.aspect 67 view
2024-06-24 trpg143 67 view
Essays by user mminhhchau :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 377, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
... food boxes and other diverse products, comprising of garments, recycling bags and even penci...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, after all, in addition, in general, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51813471503 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72214586731 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683937823834 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3270863224 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.142857143 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0466658772943 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0208927131175 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0194443740748 0.0843802449381 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0324317372023 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131529100016 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.06136585366 133% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.