Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In the era of commerce, there is a popular claim that it is the power of marketing, not the urgent needs of consumers leads to the high sales of gears. I am of the argument that which products are in high demand have to substantially benefit the general public, and I will give the reasons to prove that point in this essay.
First and foremost, it totally depends on the quality of products that truly attracts the consumers. If the quality is guaranteed, the demands on these goods are always high without any advertising tricks. Besides, people insist that no matter how frequently they are advertised, the goods in need are always in high sales. To prove my point, even though food is always in mass-produced, especially rice and vegetables, they are well-received, without any marketing skills.
Furthermore, in some cases, so offensive is the advertisement density that people are bothered and irritated. To do a commercial promotion, personal information is stolen by adman, which leads to individual anxiety about his private data. A persuasive example in this point would be that in several social media, repeatedly does the products people have just searched appear when they are online.
Granted, there is no denying that not until a number of promotional methods are strongly developed, are commercial scales enlarged, become more massive than ever. Still, I would like to emphasize that whenever products are highly recommended instinctively, they are taken priority.
In conclusion, the quantities of high sales gears absolutely based on how trustworthy are they and the way advertising methods are applied practically. Therefore, I firmly believe that the individual needs are given priority.
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shop and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 91
- he graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Populations of countries of the European Union in 1998 and 2007 by percentage 81
- Technology has brought so many changes that modern lifestyles are completely different from the way people lived in the past Do you think the positive effects of technology outweigh its disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...emand have to substantially benefit the general public, and I will give the reasons to prove t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26181818182 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.935300117 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578181818182 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2065500807 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.307692308 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214387726438 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703540430131 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616248920246 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109009338839 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490500507985 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.