The table and bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston Texas

Essay topics:

The table and bar chart below give information about travelling to work in Houston, Texas

The table chart compares the number of people who travel by using each type of transport and their average ages. While the bar chart illustrates the amount of CO2 emissions produced by human vehicles.

Overall, it is clear that the proportions of cars for one person is popular with commuters who are 43 years old on average. Moreover, the figure for the bar chart shows that car used by one driver consequently produces the highest number of CO2 emissions

The number of cars which is used by one person in the age group 43, on average is responsible for 48%. By contrast, the data of people with an average age of 39 who tend to prefer cycling or walking is 4%. The percentages of travellers who use cars for more than a person by the age of 44 and people who use trains or buses by the age of 47 are responsible for 11% and 37% respectively.

It is notable that the figure for commuters who use cars for one driver reaches a peak of over 0.3 kilograms, making the highest rates among the forms of transportation. While no figure is given for the cycling and walking forms. The ratio of emissions from cars for 4 people is over 0.05. Meanwhile, the emissions from buses or trains are witnessed to produce 0.01 kilograms.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-02 phuongnguyen1234 67 view
2022-11-01 phuongnguyen1234 67 view
2022-01-13 becky123bts 78 view
2021-09-30 golemzzz2006 54 view
2021-09-30 golemzzz2006 67 view
Essays by user phuongnguyen1234 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...pe of transport and their average ages. While the bar chart illustrates the amount of...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...or one person is popular with commuters who are 43 years old on average. Moreover, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for more than a person by the age of 44 and people who use trains or buses by th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, moreover, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54260089686 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55834214301 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488789237668 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4448344657 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.3 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0657724591078 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325888252476 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485689966961 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.061844814266 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694814279748 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.