The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
The change in the number of male and female labors in addition to that of factories in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 is displayed in the table.
Overall, the figure for workers shrunk considerably, both men and women in two aforementioned Great Britain's countries. However, that for factories experienced an upward trend, with fluctuation.
Initially, the total of employees was nearly 480, 000, being the highest among the all periods given. Additionally, the males accounted for almost 300, 00, being higher than females by a gap of approximately 100, 000. Turning to factory number, only 225 companies were established in two nations of the UK.
Eventually, the figure for labors totally decreased to around 60, 000, and both sexes were seen to share a same number mostly in about a half of that for the former. When it came to that for working places, this showed a contrast that it increased to be mostly threefold throughout last five decades.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'periods'' or 'period's'?
Suggestion: periods'; period's
...0, 000, being the highest among the all periods given. Additionally, the males accounte...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01863354037 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75781993117 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670807453416 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2016159656 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153861766771 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692812873305 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101074709651 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113461879153 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122357618145 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.