The table below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries
The two tables compares the amount of money accrued from coffee and bananas sold by Fairtrade between 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Overall, in 1999, Switzerland recorded high sales rate of coffee, while Sweden has the least amount of money accrued. Five years later, there was a huge increase in coffee sales in UK, as all other countries' sales rose marginally. In terms of bananas, UK has the highest sales rate throughout the given periods, whilst Denmark has insignificant sales in 1999, then overtaken by Sweden in 2004. Generally, the amount of money accumulated from bananas increase for 3 countries only, as 2 of them recorded a decline in sales.
It is noticeable, in 1999, the country which recorded high sales of coffee was Switzerland, at 3 million euros, as Sweden had the least sales of 0.8 million euros. moreover, in 2004, UK has majority of sales of 20 million euros which accrued from 1.5euros in 1999, as Sweden remained with insignificant sales of 1 million euros in 2004. There was a general increase in sales of coffee for all countries, with UK and Switzerland having more than 100% rise in sales. The sales of coffee in UK halved that of Switzerland in 1999.
Furthermore, UK has the greatest amount of money accumulated from bananas in 1999 and 2004, which increased significantly from 15 million euros to 47 million euros respectively. Denmark had the least sales of bananas in 1999 of 0.6million euros, whilst in 2004, it was experienced by Sweden with 0.9 million euros. UK, Switzerland and Denmark had a significant rise in banana sales from 1999 to 2004, comparing with Belgium and Sweden which experienced a slight decline in 2004. Of note, UK had higher sales rate for coffee and bananas for the given period, while Sweden has a lower sales rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- People eat more and more processed food than they did in the past.Why is this?What are the effects of this ? 56
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. 67
- Government should spend more money on railways than roads.To what extend do you agree or disagree. 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for examples working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The process that is used to manufacture the bricks for a building industry. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...d the least sales of 0.8 million euros. moreover, in 2004, UK has majority of sales of 2...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r all countries, with UK and Switzerland having more than 100% rise in sales. The...
^^
Line 13, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of 0.6million euros, whilst in 2004, it was experienced by Sweden with 0.9 milli...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 965.302439024 155% => OK
No of words: 306.0 196.424390244 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90522875817 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6677577705 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.401960784314 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 283.868780488 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7399861022 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.461538462 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300068675455 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143923460008 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692191949489 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237633968686 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579440292028 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.