In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Many technological breakthroughs have been already made in the field of agriculture, but there still are many people who are in need of urgent food. In this essay, I will explain some reasons and suggest some possible solutions for this.
Having a wealthy condition is a strong foundation bringing an exponential development of developed countries compared to the others. They invest more and more money to all the aspects serving for their life such as technology, science, agriculture,... in order to save the human resources. While it is still a harsh challenge for those countries that do not have a lot of expenditure helping even for food of citizens. Human-made for everything is one of the most useful methods for their living, especially in agriculture. The worst thing is that they can not predict how the weather is going to, as a consequence, they need to deal with all types of disasters like flood, erosion, drought,... leading the famine expands in every corner of the country.
A co-operation between these countries is an effective solution in this case. Developed countries can help to equip the machine, human resource or even investing in agriculture for developing and poor countries. More than that, the government of these deal-with-difficult countries can reduce the tax in general on food or poor water to down all the fee paid by the resident. Thenceforth, the living standard of people is improved significantly, and it becomes one of the essential factors in building a stunning nation.
In conclusion, the development in agriculture does not go together with people living in a full situation around the world. Authorized competent bodies take an important role in controlling, operating, and improving its country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | BIBHU KALITA | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | yasamin27 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | Iruki | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | aria etemadi | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | JiaYanLi | 73 | view |
- In many schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects and boys choose science subjectsWhat do you think are the reasons?Do you think that this tendency should be changed 56
- In many schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects and boys choose science subjectsWhat do you think are the reasons?Do you think that this tendency should be changed? 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in rented and owned accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 89
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars? 61
- Some people think that good health is a basic human need so the medical service should not be run by profit-making companies.Do you think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...such as technology, science, agriculture,... in order to save the human resources....
^^
Line 2, column 690, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...f disasters like flood, erosion, drought,... leading the famine expands in every c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, still, then, while, in conclusion, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17667844523 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12810072915 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3883986396 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171805401094 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051789109991 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546191204016 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113982719483 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633432452174 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.