The table below gives information about changes in modes pf travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table gives some information about eight different types of mode of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
In general, by 2000 although the average of the number of people who traveled by car had maximum number with 4806, the people did not like to travel by taxi in 1985 by 13 miles travel in England.
As can be seen, sum of all modes in 1985 is 4740 a little less than the average distances in miles travelled by car in 2000. That mean the car was very important machine to travel that people used it. More than 70 percent of 4740 miles related to car with 3199 miles. Other, local bus, train, and walking ordered had 450, 429, 289 and 255 distance miles and other groups were no longer significant.
By 2000 sum of all modes is 6475 that most of it related to car with 4806 after that other located in second place with 585 average distances in miles travel. The train and walking ordered with 366 and 237 located in third and fourth places and other three groups were no longer significant. It is obviously that people did not use taxi and bicycle to travel.
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 61
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- the graph gives information about male and female gym membership between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther groups were no longer significant. By 2000 sum of all modes is 6475 that mo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40703517588 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09116483796 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532663316583 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.952547065 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4444444444 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174224250551 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886937005341 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127692289399 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166268501316 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153820561823 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.