The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.

The given table reveals data about the date opened, length, and the number of passengers per year of the underground railway systems in six cities.

It is clear that, the rail networks in three cities: London, Paris and Tokyo are older, longer and also more crowded than that in Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles.

The underground railway system in London has the oldest age and it is the only one of six systems built in the 19th century. It is also the largest one, it is 394 kilometers long, nearly double the length of the second-oldest system in Paris. Although Tokyo's network is not the largest or oldest one, with the number of 1927 customers served per year, it is the busiest underground railway system, and it far exceeds the figure of the other five systems.

Turning to the three newer networks, Washington DC's system is the oldest, largest and most crowded of the three. It is 126 km long, which is over 10 fold longer than Kyoto's system and nearly 4 times longer than that of Los Angeles. The number of passengers served by Washington DC's rail network per year is 1.5 times more than that of Kyoto and Los Angeles combined.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-14 nhatvynguyen711 view
2023-05-26 hieu13092006 56 view
2023-05-04 tranhien862002 100 view
2023-05-03 nltnhi2104 56 view
2023-03-04 tragiang0606 56 view
Essays by user Vũ Ngọc Lam :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Turning to the three newer networks, Washington DCs system is the oldest, lar...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63725490196 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31549035382 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3007088578 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197084043222 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101016128739 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111226763939 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135831177866 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122535319126 0.0819641961636 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.