The table below provides statistics on major metro systems around the world
The table below represents data regarding MRT systems of some specific cities from all over the world. In general, London’s metro dominates in the total length aspect and Tokyo’s metro stands first in the carrying capacity per year, whilst Kyoto’s is the lowest in both aspects.
London metro systems were completed in 1863. In contrast to this, metro systems in Los Angeles were most recently completed in 2001. It seems that in the sum of length, London is at a peak with 1100 km while Paris comes at second with 594, nearly half of London metro systems (and both are completed in… and… respectively) . The total length seems to be contradicted with the year completion when Kyoto’s is 11 km and Los Angeles systems is 14 km which was higher than Kyoto’s just 3 km and both are finished later than London’s more than 100 years.
In the carrying capacity per year factor, it seems that Tokyo metro systems stand on top and following by Paris’, which is lower than the first almost 600 millions. Tokyo’s, London’s and Paris’s are way higher than the left three. London systems, which capacity is 548 millions, is approximately five times higher than Los Angeles systems, which was just 90 millions. Kyoto metro systems are lower than Tokyo metro systems over 1400 millions which stand at the number 11 of both factors.
- The table below provides statistics on major metro systems around the world 61
- Although modern life has improved people s standard of living people are not generally happy with their lives 82
- Bar charts Changes in broadband product sales compared to last year 92
- Graph Average daily traffic volumes in the London area 78
- Process international ATM transaction 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...tro systems and both are completed in… and… respectively . The total length seems...
^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Respectively
...stems and both are completed in… and… respectively . The total length seems to be contradi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...th are completed in… and… respectively . The total length seems to be contradict...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, while, in contrast, in general, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91228070175 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4186779158 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2964474901 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172090924882 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912978413267 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704622099104 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137710099288 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511292301076 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.