The table below provides statistics on several major metro (MRT) systems around the world. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant (at least 150 words).
A glance at the table provided reveals a number of clear differences between the major metro systems of the world in terms of age, scale and annual carrying capacity.
It is evident that the more recently established metro systems are considerably shorter than the older ones.
Completed in 1863, the London underground is the oldest of the metro systems listed and also the longest, extending for 1100 kilometers. Likewise, the second oldest system is also the second longest: built in 1890. The Paris metro is some 594 kilometers in length. In stark contrast, however, the Kyoto and Los Angeles metro system - established in 1890 and 2001 respectively - are far shorter. The former covers a mere 11 kilometers and the latter just 14 kilometers.
With regard to yearly carrying capacity, the metro systems mentioned in the table vary greatly. The Tokyo metro is equipped to carry the largest number of passengers, at 1434 million. With 850 million, meanwhile, the Paris metro has the second largest carrying capacity. The systems with the smallest capacities are those of Kyoto and Washington DC, transported just 11 million and 70 million people per year respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-13 | Pufznn | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-08 | Harman97 | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-08 | khush09 | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-08 | Raspreet s. | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | jaspreet singh11 | 67 | view |
- The table below provides statistics on several major metro MRT systems around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant at least 150 words 64
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country, in millions 22
- Young people should spend more time on music and theater and less time on sport. How far do you agree with this statement? 56
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. 56
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, second, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71249679979 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5248742525 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8181818182 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153683910515 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613898904076 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049028154803 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104072404167 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520867940977 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.