The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005
The bar graph represented the number (in thousands) of students taking particular subjects at their university.
Overall, we can obviously see from the chart that it grouped the students according to subjects and then divided into males and females.
There were quite different numbers of males choosing subjects. The number of boys taking subjects ranged from the highest of just over 20 thousand to the lowest of under 5 thousand. Sciences were the subjects more chosen by males than females. Meanwhile, Languages had less choice of boys than girls.
In terms of females, the student numbers differed fairly from males. The number of girls choosing subjects ranged from the highest of just under 25 thousand to the lowest of slightly below 5 thousand. Social Sciences had the most choices of females than males while Mathematics had the least ones and less than males in Mathematics.
Besides, Humanities had the same numbers of students choosing it in terms of males and females.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | Ayu Maulida | view | |
| 2022-05-24 | BaoNganB2109248 | view | |
| 2022-03-26 | VoNguyenBaoNgocB2102351 | 91 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | Bùi Thị Xuân Thảo | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-22 | Vũ Hải Đăng | view |
- Young people should spend more time on music and theater and less time on sport. How far do you agree with this statement? 56
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country, in millions 56
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005 73
- The table below provides statistics on several major metro MRT systems around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant at least 150 words 64
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country, in millions 22
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15527950311 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52225922489 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7637774014 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185330791706 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852331653434 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579502952869 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126044278522 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396915868744 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.