The table below show information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries.
The table provides the information on the proportion of senior citizens in Canada, Germany and Britain in 1988 and 2000 and estimated figures of the year 2030
From a general perspective, the highest percentage of elderly density was in Germany, which underwent aging population while the lowest can be seen in United Kingdom over the period given. Another noticeable point is that the population of the elderly are expected to surge nearly the same amount in 2030.
From 1988 to 2000, although started at different satistics in 1988, Canada and Germany witnessed the similar growth. In particular, these countries rose shaply, jumping from 16,32% and 20,45% to 20,67% and 25,32% in the next 12 years. Meanwhile, elderly population in the UK prevailed from 1988 to 2000, hovered around 14,23% and 14,89%.
By 2030, the contribution of people aged 65 and above to these countries’ population are predicted to increase by 5.5 percent. With the rising percentage, the figures of Germany reached the highest record of roungly one-third. On the other hand, it is forecasted that the lowest proportion will be observed in UK, with more than one-fifth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-31 | vananhxh2005 | 82 | view |
| 2022-03-22 | vananhxh2005 | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | KEVA | 10 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | anna103 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-29 | lamvybbi | 73 | view |
- The table below show information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 89
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 41
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 87
- The chart below shows the movement of people from rural to urban areas in three countries and predictions for future years 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table provides the information on th...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and estimated figures of the year 2030 From a general perspective, the highest ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...surge nearly the same amount in 2030. From 1988 to 2000, although started at d...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...000, hovered around 14,23% and 14,89%. By 2030, the contribution of people aged...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, third, while, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16577540107 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70291101046 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625668449198 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.2147989646 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.75 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159280934615 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670450034437 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975205504624 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886804259854 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409307710144 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.