The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.
The line graph compares the figures for wheat exports in Australia, Canada, and the European Community over six consecutive years.
From a general perspective, it is clear that Australia and Canada trends were reasonably converse with a gradual decline in the former and a slight climb in the latter. Moreover, the number of Canadian exports fluctuated between 1985 and 1990 and reached a plateau in 1998.
In terms of Australia, despite a minimal increase, it decreased progressively since 1986 and touched the lowest point of 10 million in 1990. Conversely, it was also the year that the European Community witnessed a peak of 21 million after a rapid recovery.
Turning to Canada, This nation’s exports vary over time. Standing at nearly 20 million in 1985, it dropped by 8 million in the following year. Compared to the European Community, Canada’s increase was much higher and pushed the statistics to a record high of 25 million in 1988. However, the year 1989 marked the point at which European Community overtook that for Canada
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-05 | MinhGoal1 | view | |
| 2023-11-16 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 11
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas 78
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 11
- The line chart details the proportion of residents living in Australia in millions from different regions between 1976 and 2011 41
- The table below show information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Community over six consecutive years. From a general perspective, it is clear ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 1990 and reached a plateau in 1998. In terms of Australia, despite a minimal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, however, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08139534884 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73626665715 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622093023256 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5136654661 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1111111111 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0790237499062 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376077511879 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615261003173 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.061102780487 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068520576683 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.