The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.

The bar graph below show the numbers of imprisonment in five different countries - Great Britain, Australia, new Zealand, United States, and Canada between 1930 and 1980. Overall, Canada had the highest number of detainees in 1930, while great britain had the least, but after 50 years the number decreased in Canada and raised in great britain, with the United States having the largest amount.
Initially, in 1930 Canada had 120 thousand prisoners - the highest number of inmates among all five countries. There were 100 thousand prisoners both in New Zealand and the United States, while australia had fewer incarcerated people, around 70 thousand. Great Britain had the lowest amount, with the number being around 30 thousand.
after a decade, the prisoner's number in great britain remained the same, while in Australia and Canada it dropped slight and it halved in new Zealand. On the contrary, the total number of inmates increased in the united states reaching 130 thousand.
In 1950, the prisoners’ number increased in Britain and slightly decreased in Australia and New Zealand. On the other hand, the prisoner in Canada increased and got highest among the five countries and decreased in the US. A similar trend in terms of prisoner numbers in these countries could be observed after a decade. Finally, in 1980, the prisoners’ number in these countries increased except in Australia. The US had the highest number of prisoners in this year and Great Britain, Canada and New Zealand had more than 80 thousand prisoners in this year.

In summary, over the 50 years period, the crime and imprisonment number got worse in US and Britain while Australia, Canada and New Zealand did some progress. In 1980, Australia had the least number of prisoners which show their improvement in law and order.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
... the number being around 30 thousand. after a decade, the prisoners number in great...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, while, in summary, on the contrary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 965.302439024 157% => OK
No of words: 296.0 196.424390244 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13513513514 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61555601781 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422297297297 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 283.868780488 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9037449014 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101073492617 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529692275632 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619141309561 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687829473304 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387219923393 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.