The table below shows information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002

Essay topics:

The table below shows information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.

The table illustrates expenditure of five different countries (Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Turkey) in different categories in 2002.

Overall, most of the money was spent by Turkey on all the items collectively
whereas Sweden spent the least amount of money. Furthermore, highest spending of all five countries were on Food, Drinks and Tabacco while Leisure and education were the categories having lowest expenditure from all countries.

In terms of Food, Drinks and Tabacco, spending of Turkey were 32.14% followed by Ireland, Spain, Italy and Sweden with 28.91%, 18.80%, 16.36% and 15.77% respectively. On the other hand, in Clothing/Footwear, Italy spent the most, however, Sweden spent least in this category also. Moreover, expenditure of Turkey in Leisure and Education was higher and that of Spain was lower than other countries.

Both Italy and Ireland spent three times more on Clothing and Footwear(9.00% and 6.43% respectively) than Leisure and Education (3.20% and 2.21% respectively). Similarly the difference between spending of Spain on Clothing/Footwear and Leisure/Education is significantly highest.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-30 Ahmad_off 84 view
2023-08-07 .zin@ 78 view
2023-06-25 MiaMia_8786 56 view
2023-04-18 minthu vũ view
2023-04-13 anhminhbnvn1 84 view
Essays by user jessie_12345 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by Turkey on all the items collectively whereas Sweden spent the least amount of...
^^^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the highest'.
Suggestion: , the highest
...t the least amount of money. Furthermore, highest spending of all five countries were on ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the lowest'.
Suggestion: having the lowest
...isure and education were the categories having lowest expenditure from all countries. In t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 276, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...er, Sweden spent least in this category also. Moreover, expenditure of Turkey in Lei...
^^^^
Line 8, column 157, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...Education 3.20% and 2.21% respectively. Similarly the difference between spending of Spai...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78313253012 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19349843954 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542168674699 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.064786472 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151604823253 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787559634948 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112309936519 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112537801859 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121163227501 0.0819641961636 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.