The best way to resolve international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A large number of solutions are proposed by international experts in order to solve global environmental issues. While I accept that raising fuel prices is also an effective way to fight climate change, I believe that this is not the best measure to alleviate environmental problems.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why the government should raise taxes on the cost of fuel. Firstly, adopting this policy would almost make people less use private means such as cars, motorbikes. Fewer car journeys would mean a reduction in exhaust emissions which contribute to the process of global warming. Secondly, by increasing petrol prices, there would be less dependence on fossil fuel depleting more and more. Thus, I believe that international bodies should exert pressure on countries to raise fuel prices.
On the other hand, I suppose that there are more effective ways to tackle international environmental issues. First, from a transport policy perspective, it is important to introduce restrictions on private vehicles to cut down on emissions. For example, the congestion charge on vehicles in London has improved air quality. Furthermore, there is a need to find and use alternative energy sources like wind power, solar power, hydro power etc. These are clean, renewable energy sources and has no negative effect on our environment.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that raising fuel cost would be a useful measure but this is by no means it is the best solution to deal with a wider range of global environmental problems.
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups inone town who rode bicycles in 2011 61
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. 56
- The diagram below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areasof the world. 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
A large number of solutions are proposed by international...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14741035857 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89743073077 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605577689243 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2989054033 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3846153846 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176073141266 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059591982009 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053403842356 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111669533035 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359056330306 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.