The table below shows the percentage of the rooms occupied in six hotels during may to September between 1985 and 2000 the table also incates the Star rating of each hotel

Essay topics:

The table below shows the percentage of the rooms occupied in six hotels during may to September between 1985 and 2000 the table also incates the Star rating of each hotel.

The assigned table illustrates the information about the percentum of occupied rooms in six hotels with distinct star rating in the duration of may to September from the year 1985 to 2000.

Overall, the hotel Hamilton's and Hampton's had the lion share in the starting of the period while at the year the least amount of occupied rooms was cantained by the hotel Concorde.

At a fleeting glance, it is immensely clear regarding occupation of rooms that the top seat was notched by Hamilton's and Hampton's with 100% with five and three star rating respectively in 1985 and in the same year with four stars the Tower hotel cantoned 57% occupied rooms. Besides that, 79% rooms were reserved in the Continental hotel. In the next year, the occupation of rooms in Hamilton's and Hampton's remain same as last year as far as the continental had experienced a increase of 11% in this year. The ratio of the Hotel Olivia was 90 in 1985 that declined up to 5 % in the 1990.

Further scrutinising the chart, in the year 1995 the noticeably experienced the decrease of three fold than was exact 30% with rating of 5 Stars and Hamilton's again ranked top in room occupation however the reserved room proportion hovered between 50% to 90%. At the last, Hampton's bagged top in the list with full room occupation and hotel Olivia percentage was 5% less than Hampton's and 80% rooms reserved in the continental and the observed percentile of hotel Concorde, Hamilton's and the tower was 65, 70 and 85 sequentially at the last year.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-10 Rozy pal 67 view
Essays by user Rozy pal :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... far as the continental had experienced a increase of 11% in this year. The ratio...
^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...that declined up to 5 % in the 1990. Further scrutinising the chart, in the year 199...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, may, regarding, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74242424242 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6060422165 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481060606061 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7852103824 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.5 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27482143181 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146384005167 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106046706856 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215549061169 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112325078803 0.0819641961636 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.