The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The table illustrates the information about poverty rates among six types of households in Australia in 1999.
Overall, the survey was conducted by 1,837,000 of Australian people which represented 11% of total household in Australia. It is noticeable that, single person recorded for the higher poverty rates than couples, and people with children were more likely to be poor than those without. Poverty rates were considerably lower for elders regardless with being single or couple.
Just over a fifth of single parents were living in poverty, whereas only 12% of family with children lived under poverty. The same pattern can be seen for people with no children. Just under a fifth of single without children were living under the poverty line, while the figure for couples was much lower, at only 7%. The aged family showed much lower percentage of living in poverty where 6% for single and 4% for couples.
- The graph below gives information from a 2006 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010. 73
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world What are the reasons for this and suggest some solutions 91
- The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort 84
- paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, which is important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion? 56
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'so', 'whereas', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.270588235294 0.268076937826 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.117647058824 0.116061578633 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.105882352941 0.0759168565197 139% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0352941176471 0.0366838410393 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00588235294118 0.0131127313244 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.217647058824 0.155750635184 140% => OK
Participles: 0.0470588235294 0.0379272487307 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.43449329396 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00588235294118 0.0210936926555 28% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0705882352941 0.0948980150116 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00588235294118 0.00437022459523 135% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0117647058824 0.00967000014798 122% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 911.0 1161.00487805 78% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.9 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03311258278 5.90752243213 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73763899035 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.377483443709 0.337110787985 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.238410596026 0.247514529752 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.165562913907 0.171178102325 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0993377483444 0.112407865282 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43449329396 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622516556291 0.546246751206 114% => OK
Word variations: 55.5803763241 49.3433353143 113% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 18.875 23.0094962315 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3672862212 42.9750493124 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 135.714022679 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 23.0094962315 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.689975730869 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 42.7160596026 47.7609492067 89% => OK
Elegance: 3.37037037037 2.94281807926 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384968044475 0.418131533498 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.151336942925 0.181151798455 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0873465660551 0.0850326197045 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.624235949821 0.706616315825 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.189765145336 0.157042692854 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201996572234 0.228904883108 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148270454567 0.108899403657 136% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.292328002157 0.367819155151 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0898964490371 0.0812612215331 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331263574252 0.316326947829 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129795082763 0.0921553760075 141% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70731707317 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.14146341463 613% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.16585365854 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 7.0 0.956097560976 732% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.