The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The given table illustrates the proportion of dissimilar types of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. This essay will discuss the number and percentage of such impoverished families for the same year.
Overall, about 18.3 million Australian families were poor, also the percentage of all households was low in the given year. As the data suggests, the category of the sole parents in Australia was the highest allotment of poverty, however the single aged person had the lowest rate (4%) in the same year. While single aged person had 6 percent of poverty, also single but without children had 3 times more in the same time. From the table it can be clearly seen that couple with children were 2 times less than a couple without any children.
In conclusion, from the given table the category of couple with children had more percentage than other categories from the table, but the aged couple people had the lowly percentum among other poor families.
- As the world becomes technologically advanced, computer are replacing more and more job. What are some job positions that may be lost because of computers What are some problems that may result from this situation. 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. Summarise the information below by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 73
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
- the charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information below by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90243902439 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46567754069 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1208726147 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.857142857 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187073153981 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106890442278 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150299470143 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158784233095 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120744866637 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.