The table below shows the salaries of secondary/high school teachers in 2009
The table compares secondary and high school teachers’ from different countries namely Australia, Denmark, Luxembourg, Japan and Korea in 2009.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that while Luxembourg teachers earned the highest salary from their job, Australian tutors had the lowest income. Additionally, although Japanese teachers had the second highest income, they were required to work the longest time compared to other countries.
Looking at the table in more details, Luxembourg instructors had the highest starting point of 80.000, which was almost two times higher than that in Denmark, which was 45.000. Following this were Japan, Korea, Australia with the basis of 34.000, 30.000, 28.000 relatively. After 15 years, teachers in Luxembourg was still paid the most, with about 119.000 while the same figure from other countries ranging from 48.000 to 65.000.
However, to reach the maximum salary, the most well-paid country for teaching job, Luxembourg, required teachers to have at least 30 years of experience to gain a maximum of 132.000, which was the second hardest requirement, compared to the top of 37 years to get the highest of 86.000 in Japan. Meanwhile, Korean teachers needed no less than 34 years to have the highest salary of 62.000. It is also worth pointing out that although Australian and Denmark teachers had the lowest maximum salary of 48.000 and 54.000, they were only required to work for about 8 to 9 years to achieve this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view |
- Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important To what do you extent agree or disagree 61
- Many people are now spending more and more time traveling to work or school Some people believe that this is a negative development while others think there are some benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 65
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers 73
- Some people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Others believe that there are health benefits of living in the cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, second, so, still, well, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23728813559 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5382876783 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584745762712 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0574758954 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.333333333 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145841592212 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806146189264 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970842106733 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134078263441 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122022867611 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.